Some people believe positive thinking has benefits while, other consider it has drawbacks. Discuss both the view and give your opinion.
At the outset of new millenium many reseascher have studied that positive thincking is important role for success in life, which could lead to deluge of concern. Some people believe that positive thinking has benefits while another group of thinker support that positive thinking has more drawbacks. However, both bas its own aıdvantages and disadventages. Therefore, positive thinking has more positive outcomes as compared to nagative outcomes.
To begin with, I manifested my opinion by saying that positive thinking has improve person lifestyle and also people feel fresh, when they think positive. It is good way to feel relax and reduce the level of stree in their life. In addition, positive thinking has improve Physical strength. As a result, people are easily focus on their task and they get good result and they also give their best in activity. For example, if we tell ourselves that we can do it then any negative feelings of not being able to do something will disappear and it also help to improve people personal skills.
On the other hand, positive thinking has few drawbacks. If person think about something in positive way, then they do not focus on their task and they spent their most of the time on thnking, which reduce their work life style. In addition, positive thinking nake many problems,if person not achieve their goal then they feel stress and also face mental problems. After that people do sucide and face physical problems while, some of people has positive thinking after that they feel overconfident and lost their goals.
To recapitulate, although both side have their own convincing argument yet it has felt it depend on the ones to use such approach in a positive or negative manner. In my opinion, I would say that positive thinking is the best way to deal with situation.
- The chart below shows the percentage of industry sectors contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 73
- The charts below give information about the national distribution of water and the average domestic water usage in the country of Astoria 73
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average australian family in 1991 and 2001 40
- The graph below shows the number of complaint made about noise to environment health authorities in city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 73
- Some people believe positive thinking has benefits while other consider it has drawbacks Discuss both the view and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...on by saying that positive thinking has improve person lifestyle and also people feel f...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...ife. In addition, positive thinking has improve Physical strength. As a result, people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 550, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...do something will disappear and it also help to improve people personal skills. On ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
...on, positive thinking nake many problems,if person not achieve their goal then they...
^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the people') or simply say ''some people''.
Suggestion: some of the people; some people
...ucide and face physical problems while, some of people has positive thinking after that they f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9606557377 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51613658111 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531147540984 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4483601532 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.866666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267417528122 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107252563333 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897954676478 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171331893219 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564867753047 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.