the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team
the reading and the lecture are both about the advantages and disadvantages of group working. The author of the reading believes that this teamwork has a bunch of benefits. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. he thinks that teamwork has various drawbacks.
First of all, the author claims that the project conducted by a team is efficient due to the knowledge and expertise that the whole group has. this point is challenged by the lecturer. he says that some team members fail to work in a group and have no contribution, otherwise in the process of evaluating the project, these people are not mentioned. furthermore, It is not obvious who participated or not.
secondly, the author states that the project will be done quickly. he argues that each of the group works faster than what has assigned to them and find the best solution for the project problems. the lecturer rebuts this. he suggests it is probable that the project lasts longer. he elaborates on this by mentioning that reaching consensus and building agreement in a group is much hard.
finally, the author mentions that team working is not only valuable for the influential members but also it is much a chance for individuals to shine when the consequence of the project is impressive. on the other hand, the lecturer states that some members who have a great idea might be ignored by others. but if the project fails, the fault is on all the members.
To conclude, the lecturer firmly believes that group working has a different kind of problems, and he counters the points made by the reading, whose author thinks it is full of benefits.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 70
- the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 70
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest f 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading and the lecture are both about ...
^^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...oubt on the claims made in the article. he thinks that teamwork has various drawba...
^^
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...and expertise that the whole group has. this point is challenged by the lecturer. he...
^^^^
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...is point is challenged by the lecturer. he says that some team members fail to wor...
^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...roject, these people are not mentioned. furthermore, It is not obvious who participated or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...s not obvious who participated or not. secondly, the author states that the project wil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... that the project will be done quickly. he argues that each of the group works fas...
^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...best solution for the project problems. the lecturer rebuts this. he suggests it is...
^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ect problems. the lecturer rebuts this. he suggests it is probable that the projec...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...probable that the project lasts longer. he elaborates on this by mentioning that r...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...ing agreement in a group is much hard. finally, the author mentions that team working ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...nsequence of the project is impressive. on the other hand, the lecturer states tha...
^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... great idea might be ignored by others. but if the project fails, the fault is on a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78445229682 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62239382889 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501766784452 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.3101701811 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6470588235 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169294687792 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497142037069 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527139426955 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916040263991 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601638737338 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.