The chart shows the hours per week spent watching TV by gender and by age group in 2001 in Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart gives information about the time spent watching TV by Australian citizens by gender in various age group in 2001. It divides ages to different groups from under 15 to over 55.
Overall, the hours spent on TV by female was higher than that of by male in every age groups, except the age group from 36 to 45 when men were spending more time on TV than women. Moreover, both the highest and lowest time spending on watching TV was made by female.
To be specific, in the age group under 15, the hours of spending time on TV were the highest, which accounted for 25% while from 36 to 45 years old they also spent the least hours per week on watching TV. Most of age groups spending on TV is led by female, just once in the ages of 36 to 45 when male was spending more time on watching TV than female. Another striking feature was that the hours spent on TV of male under 15 was similar to the age groups from 26 to 35 and from 46 to 55 while that of female was alike in the age groups from 15 to 25 and over 55, which were 15 and 20 hours respectively.
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram shows how paper clips are produced Write a full description of the production process 78
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.0663507109 4.92477711251 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09697297508 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445497630332 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5487197102 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244346889952 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142797698782 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723627804543 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196193908843 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463700417926 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.92 11.4140731707 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.