The map illustrates the change of an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now
The map demonstrates the modifications of an Australian art gallery in 1950 and now
It is clear that significant changes were made to the gallery, particularly the replacement of the courtyard into some indoor facilities to meet the visitors’ demands. In addition, some functional parts were added to the layout of the gallery such as WC and ticket.
In 1950, there was a vast courtyard covered all the northern part of the gallery, which was then demolished and be replaced by a number of indoor rooms such as children art room and Australian Aboriginal and Australian Art. On the right-hand side of the construction, art forms from various continents were displayed there. In 1950, there were only Australian and European arts, however, the addition of an Asian one is made at the bottom right in today’s gallery.
Looking at the center of the 1950’s gallery, a vast interior area was used to displayed only sculpture, which still remained to present except a ticket area was built at the bottom of it. On the left-hand side, a café, a temporary exhibition, and a bookshop were located there in 1950. Almost no change happened to the left wing apart from the addition of a WC next to the café.
- The diagram below describes how storm water is recycled in an Australian city 78
- Some people think the government should pay for health care and education but other people claim that it is the individual s responsibility Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 89
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- In most parts of the world the volume of traffic is growing at an alarming rate In the form of an assignment discuss about the main traffic problems in your country their causes and possible solutions 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, still, then, apart from, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84541062802 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82181848672 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56038647343 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3011971274 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228073274976 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941020608775 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892233084401 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192555788475 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181093050877 0.0819641961636 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.