The growth of multinational companies and the resulting rise of globalization creates positive effects for all. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
An increasing number of international companies and the resulting rise of globalization has brought significant changes to our lives in recent years. Yet, there remain some viewpoints as the overall effect of this phenomenon has been positive for all. I believe that the benefits of those businesses, as well as globalization, far outweigh their drawbacks. These benefits are twofold
First and foremost, multistate firms act as a springboard for a country’s economic development. This is mainly due to the fact that the advent of these companies has provided a wider range of job opportunities for laborers around the world especially for workers from developing nations which are often labor-rich and capital-scare. For instance, in Vietnam, since Uber which is a taxi network company that uses smartphone apps to connect passengers and drivers started to generate in Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh city, it has allowed not only unemployed workers but also undergraduates who need a part-time job to earn a competitive salary. Secondly, it has revolutionized the way people do their shopping. To be more specific, multinational companies play an important role in diversifying the market in order to cater to customers' needs. Therefore, consumers will be given the chance to access a wide variety of choices, ranging from domestic to foreign products. As a result, each individual’s living standard will gradually be enhanced.
In contrast, some others may claim that the rising of these large-scale companies and globalization will have an adverse bearing on the environment. Apparently, that more and more multinational companies are legal established due to globalization could put pressure on our natural resources. However, in order to tackle this problem, some leading companies have taken the initiative to produce environmentally friendly products by using alternative energies and launch the go green campaign. Consequently, other companies will have to adopt the same strategy to make more money and our environment will be eventually preserved. It can be seen that environmental factors do not pose a threat in this regard.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that despite the aforementioned negative impact, the appearance of multinational companies as a result of globalization could bring plenty of advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-07 | vungochuyen25 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | vungochuyen25 | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Ex 2 The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 89
- What are the causes effects solutions for global warming 84
- EX 4 The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir drawbacks. These benefits are twofold First and foremost, multistate firms act...
^^^
Line 2, column 1037, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng standard will gradually be enhanced. In contrast, some others may claim that ...
^^^
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs do not pose a threat in this regard. In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46961325967 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30724249714 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621546961326 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9436214874 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223648927298 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066965370506 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513110907967 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14136990209 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031835527327 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.