The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
In the near future, a small town, called Islip, will undergo an extensive development. This essay will highlight the major physical transformation of the pre and after development of the small town.
It is evident from the master plan issued officially by the municipality that the development will significantly bring a vivid change of the land use and road pattern in the north and south of the town. The north part will present an unprecedented shift in building organization; the previously grid structure is altered into a circular pattern. New spaces are also allocated for new functions, including a bus station, a car park, new housing, and a pedestrian way. Furthermore, the road will be reserved for a dual carriageway with a half-round road interweaving the eastern and the western part of Islip Town.
Moreover, the south part only portrays a slight conversion in land use, yet a massive road infrastructure development. The current land use is still preserved with an additional land function of new housing situated next to the park. The road, previously separated, will be connected, allowing a smooth trip from the western to the eastern part and vice versa.
Overall, the new immense development will modify the Islip town center to a more vibrant center with the additional land use of new various buildings and an interconnected, circular, and dual carriageway main road.
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 80
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on fuel
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17621145374 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06394553329 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555066079295 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4884398229 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108783405945 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050654154632 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502063282347 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08145089829 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569679527302 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.