The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The first map illustrates how the Grange Park looked like in 1920 while the second one shows all the changes that have happened our the last hundred years.
Overall, the public park has become very commercial and busy while in 1920 it used to be a quiet place with open spaces and gardens. Over the time, there has been development of many buildings in the park like theatres and cafes at the expense of old structures.
If we begin with what remained the same, there isn’t much to discuss. The two entrances to the park, as well as a rose gardein in the upper left corner have managed to survive. Everything else has been either replaced or removed.
A stage for musicians that used to be to the left of the fountain has been paved and an amphitheatre has been erected in its place. The central fountain itself was taken out and a rose garden was planted there with seating arrangements all around it. The rose garden and the pond in the upper right corner don’t exist anymore, rather a café and children playing area has been build at the location. Lastly, the glasshouse that used to be at the right side of the Eldon street enterance is no more there, instead a water feature greets visitors now who wish to go there.
- The maps below show the city of Stokeford in 1930 and development plans for 2030 67
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The diagram below shows the carbon cycle 61
- The tables below show the reasons for travelling and the main issues for the travelling public 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from on university did after finishing 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, look, second, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55156950673 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28243632428 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614349775785 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8946987378 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165375563208 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592579693136 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729527335439 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116798372734 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796505947254 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.