People think that government should increase the cost of fuel or cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion
People these days have to suffer from numerous complex environmental pollutions caused by fuel emissions. It is thought that raising taxes on petrol is such a practical solution to tackle this problem. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this method, and I believe that the government should adopt other effective measures.
There are several considerable justifications for the drawbacks of raising the price of petrol. Firstly, the tremendous demand of city dwellers is inevitable, and it will not be affected significantly by the rise in fuel price. People have to travel to work on a daily basis, so it is considered to be inconceivable to cut down on the private vehicles on the road during peak hours. Secondly, the hike in the petrol price is also concerned to be an economic burden for poor and middle-class families. To illustrate, the growth of fuel expenses leads to the rise of domestic transportation businesses and production cost. As a result, people experiencing financial difficulties have to pay more money for essential commodities.
When it comes to reducing gas emissions, some alternative measures should be taken into consideration in order to mitigate the fuel overconsumption. Firstly, the government should invest in renewable resources rather than non-renewable resources. In particular, scientists ought to be encouraged to work on developing environmentally-friendly vehicles driven by solar powered batteries or natural gas. In addition, regulations on restricting travel by personal vehicles should be introduced by local authorities. It is believed to not only cut down on emissions from vehicles, but also reduce the greenhouse effect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in particular, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49034749035 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45078286577 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629343629344 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4716080144 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201054563629 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589987153237 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431128387364 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134243685556 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478408893987 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.