The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
More and more teenagers are getting involved in wrong-doings, and the question whether developing better parenting skills is the most viable solution has become a topic of contention. Personally, I accept that parents’ impacts do matter, yet I strongly opine that other well-rounded measures are needed to address this problem.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that parents affect their children to a certain extent. Children spend the majority of their formative years with their parents and parents have a huge impact on developing their senses and behaviours. In fact, children tend to unconsciously imitate words and actions of parents on a daily routine. Therefore, it is important that parents should build up good attitudes and behaviours for themselves to become ideal role models for their kids. However, family time is likely to slice off due to the fact that children spend more time at school, with peers and state-of-the-art technology, while parents are usually busy keeping up with the pace of life, which lead to lack of care for children, education about crime and guide your child's actions and attitudes.
On the other hand, the government should adopt some alternatives to educate the minors and deter them from breaking the law. These days, children are susceptible to negative peer pressure. It is easy to obvious that more and more teenagers use stimulants such as alcohol, drugs or electronic cigarette, which is a primary contributor to increase juvenile delinquencies. In fact, robbery and theft are popular wrong-doing in the youngsters to satisfy their demand while they do not have the financial capacity. Therefore, imposing lessons of morality and penaties of illegal crime is a useful way to curb youth crime.
In conclusion, I believe training parental skills is not the best way to control the crime rate among the young. Government and schools also have to interfere at the same time to orientate law-abiding children’ behaviours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-02 | hieuasroma@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | chirag1234 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...e getting involved in wrong-doings, and the question whether developing better parenting skills is t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24605678233 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.859627976 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593059936909 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7643165361 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312268984324 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100127877517 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791343724836 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164708588929 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508046012172 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.