cambridge 7 test 4
The pie charts compare number of units making electricity by fuel source between two countries, Australia and France, in two different year, 1980 and 2000. Obviously, the number of units working by coal in Australia in both years was the most, while in France we see more variable usage of fuel. It changed considerably.
As can be seen, in Australia percentage of units which product electricity by coal was 50% in 1980 and it increased to 75% until 2000. Using of natural gas had noticeable decline, from 20 units in 1980 to 2 units in 2000.
In France, number of units of electricity production in 2000 is almost double. Moving to the charts, number of units using coal was 25 units and it was same in both years, whereas using nuclear power had remarkably improve from 15 units to 126 units in 2000. Units used hydro power and natural gas to product electricity the least in 2000 and it was nearly 2 units for each fuel.
In conclusion, Australia continued ti use coal as its most using foal for making electricity while France moved to nuclear power instead of other natural fuels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | Zahid6400 | 11 | view |
| 2023-11-01 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...reas using nuclear power had remarkably improve from 15 units to 126 units in 2000. Uni...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70833333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50823297141 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9422611331 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.