The chart below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six science-related subjects at a UK university in 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram gives information about how many male and female postgraduates studying six science-related subjects at a UK university in 2009. As you can see from the chart, almost the number of men is higher than the women in most of the subjects. However, the percentage of men, who learned Veterinary Medicine had fewer than women.
At the first glance, physics, astronomy, and geology, which mostly picked by the male. In Physics, the number of men accounts for more than 200, nearly 4 times as much as that of the women. This trend could be observed similar in the case of Astronomy and Geology, the quantities of male in both reach at 150 pupils, whilst the female stood at more than 50 students for the Astronomy, and nearly 100 pupils for the Geology.
Moreover, the men students, who joined in Biology, Medicine, remained higher than women. The men, who participated in the Biology faculty, hit the highest at closely 250 students more than the women 50 pupils. A similar pattern was seen in Medicine, the men reach 200 pupils over nearly 50 students compared with women. Though, the Veterinary Medicine was chosen by the female had the data at 100 pupils over one haft the men.
In summary, male research students in the UK in 2009 prefer to join in Physics, Astronomy, Biology, Medicine, while female research students mostly participated in Veterinary Medicine.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-08 | christine112 | 70 | view |
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays technology is influencing modern art in areas such as design painting and film Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 79
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 67
- buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nearly 50 students compared with women. Though, the Veterinary Medicine was chosen by ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90987124464 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62979833912 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519313304721 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1121785624 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201899670319 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849252219426 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105254631746 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144592730992 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757139251102 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.