The graphs below show the cinema attandance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs depicts cinema attendance in Australia and the frequency by different age brackets recorded over the period from 1996 to 2000.
We can observe clearly and outright that though three figures experienced fluctuation, all of them but frequency of citizens visiting theaters witnessed an upward trend.
In 1996, the percentage of population going to cinema was 62 before rose significantly to 72 and remained stable until saw a minor decline to 70 in 1999. In the following year, it increased by small margin of 2. Contrastly, despite an auspicious start with index of growth of +0.8, average visit dropped moderately and culminated in 8.3 in 2000.
From 1996 to 2000, all four age groups maintained their position. The first place appertained to 14-24 group followed by respective older counterparts. They both reached the peak in 1999 when the number of people attending cinema of each brackets is 23, 22, 20, 18. On a different scenario, they plumbed the depths in the previous year when the highest number was only 17.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-21 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
- People nowadays tend to have children at older ages Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 90
- The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think employers should not care about the way their employees dress but the quality at work To what extent you agree or disagree 84
- Goverments in many countries have recently inteoduce taxes on food and beverages with high level of sugar Some thinks these taxes are a good idea while others disagree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
- the three pictures show different type of bride summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'depict'.
Suggestion: depict
The graphs depicts cinema attendance in Australia and the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05263157895 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75616709027 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.707602339181 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4918391012 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231094811353 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857702827621 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900241345315 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139491272286 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988724751108 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.