Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is agonizing reality that a variety of technology breakthroughs have adverse impact on the environment. A number of people argue that a simpler lifestyle will protect the nature, meanwhile others opine that human being can make use of science and technology to address current environmental problems. From my own perspective, I think that both notions are effectual, however the latter is of higher efficacy.
On the one hand, it is sufficiently apparent that via simplifying daily activities, the amount of individual’s carbon footprint will be significantly reduced, thus cutting down on exhausting gases emission. To illustrate, simplified life can be defined as a way of life that emphasize on the quality of life and shifts towards natural lifestyle rather than extravagant or vanity possessions. Therefore, it stands to reason that leading a simple life can be interpreted into living environmentally friendly. For example, we can substitute driving to work for cycling or walking, or purchasing locally cultivated product instead of imported counterparts.
On the other hand, despite acknowledged negative effect on the environment, it is irrefutable that with the help of technology and science, humankind have made tremendous progress in tackling our self-made issues. For instances, the energy crisis plaguing the world recent day is undoubtfully the direct consequence of reckless and indiscriminate exploitation. Fortunately, such advances in technology as space-based solar panels or wind farm are capable of adequately supplying power without leading to hazardous repercussion. Furthermore, drawing an analogy between two proposed solutions, the latter is proven to be more efficacious as it can applied to larger scale and have greater profound results. The former, on the contrary, is appropriate to medium-scaled as it largely depends on the awareness of each individual.
In conclusion, notwithstanding advantages of simpler lifestyle to the nature, I optimistically believe science and technology can solve environmental problems.
- Some feel that schools should be mixed with both girls and boys attending while others feel the genders ought to be separated Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 92
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees Some people think it is necessary but others are of opinion that is unfair Discuss both view and give your own opinion 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is agonizing reality that a variety o...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver the latter is of higher efficacy. On the one hand, it is sufficiently appa...
^^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'apply'
Suggestion: apply
...proven to be more efficacious as it can applied to larger scale and have greater profou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75409836066 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4147285204 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2594203226 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298399255957 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924196872324 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928680748203 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197889904541 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977225793199 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is agonizing reality that a variety o...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver the latter is of higher efficacy. On the one hand, it is sufficiently appa...
^^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'apply'
Suggestion: apply
...proven to be more efficacious as it can applied to larger scale and have greater profou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75409836066 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4147285204 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2594203226 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298399255957 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924196872324 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928680748203 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197889904541 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977225793199 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.