The reading passage and lecture are both about benefits from working 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week. the author claims three benefits from working 4 days a week for companies and employees. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He contradicts each advantages from this change.
First, the writer states, the shorter workweek would increase compony profits, because workers feel more comfortable therefore, they will do more work with less error. The lrcturer refutes this statement. He mentions, working 4 days a week will cost compony more. Compony need to put money for training a new employees. Furthermore medical benefit is same for 5 days employees and 5 days employees. In adition to the number of computers and rooms for employees that will be hired.
Second, the writer argues, 4 days working provide opportunity to hire many other employees, so this will help to decrease unemployement. This argument is challenged by professor. He points to the high cost the company will sever from hiring new workers as previously said. The compony has another opion, it should encourage workers to finish their work in 4 days rather than 3 by rising their hour rate.
Finally, the athor says, decease in working hours to 4 day a week will has a benifit to workers, this is because, they will find extra time to spend it with their family. This point reputs by professor. He illustrates to finance state of employees when they decrease their hours, this will effect their economy by decrease their salary. Therefore, they can not take care of their family.
The reading passage and lecture are both about benefits from working 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week. the author claims three benefits from working 4 days a week for companies and employees. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He contradicts each advantages from this change.
First, the writer states, the shorter workweek would increase compony profits, because workers feel more comfortable therefore, they will do more work with less error. The lrcturer refutes this statement. He mentions, working 4 days a week will cost compony more. Compony need to put money for training a new employees. Furthermore medical benefit is same for 5 days employees and 5 days employees. In adition to the number of computers and rooms for employees that will be hired.
Second, the writer argues, 4 days working provide opportunity to hire many other employees, so this will help to decrease unemployement. This argument is challenged by professor. He points to the high cost the company will sever from hiring new workers as previously said. The compony has another opion, it should encourage workers to finish their work in 4 days rather than 3 by rising their hour rate.
Finally, the athor says, decease in working hours to 4 day a week will has a benifit to workers, this is because, they will find extra time to spend it with their family. This point reputs by professor. He illustrates to finance state of employees when they decrease their hours, this will effect their economy by decrease their salary. Therefore, they can not take care of their family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-13 | talelaldabous | 61 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both about methods which are used to decrease possibility of declination and extinction of frog population The author elaborates on three methods that help in decreasing of declination of frogs The lecturer casts doubt on claim 76
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about lit it burn policy like yellow stone fire which occur in United State which is mean not to suppress natural fires of forest The writer claims three kinds of damaged caused by the let it burn Howev 60
- The reading and lecture about the possibilty of life on venus The author believes that there it is imposible to live on venus The lecturer casts doubts on claims made in the arlicle he sayes we can find life on venus if we do flooting station on it first 60
- Skip to main content Independent Writing Question 1 00 00 Directions You have 30 minutes to plan and write your response Typically an effective response will be 300 words at least Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important 70
- Exit Section Test 1 Writing Section Raw Score 2 5 5 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage In the past eating avocados was not considered to be necessarily beneficial Bein 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are both...
^^
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...4 days a week instead of 5 days a week. the author claims three benefits from worki...
^^^
Line 2, column 310, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'employee'?
Suggestion: employee
...ny need to put money for training a new employees. Furthermore medical benefit is same fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...put money for training a new employees. Furthermore medical benefit is same for 5 days empl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...e in working hours to 4 day a week will has a benifit to workers, this is because, ...
^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...en they decrease their hours, this will effect their economy by decrease their salary....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89925373134 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55750035903 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 3.25607064018 369% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4245834113 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.9444444444 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8888888889 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437589986837 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153899341588 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20625667417 0.0662205650399 311% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318019302538 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.305171045181 0.0443174109184 689% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.3589403974 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.