You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Controversy exists around who key actors with the ability to positively change the environment are, with the options being individuals, governments and big corporations. Personally, I believe that while laypeople have the power to make a difference, governmental institutions and companies are also capable and responsible for making our planet healthier.
On the one hand, over the past years, numerous grass-roots initiatives have taken off everywhere, launched by passionate people with the drive to maintain the well-being of the environment in their community. One exemplary instance is the transformative effort of a local advocacy group in Hanoi, which successfully shut down the city authorities' attempt to cut down thousands of trees a few years back, after having collected a large number of petitions from other Hanoians. Because of their success, the city retained its self-sustained hypothetical lung, and the government had a wake-up call about the necessary action to preserve the environment. This is only one of the many examples of people who are consistently making progress in the fight to protect the environment.
On the other hand, drastic and comprehensive improvements are only possible with the involvement of the authorities, given the dire state of nature in many areas of the world right now. Currently, trees in the Amazon are being cut down at an unprecedented rate for agricultural purposes. This trend has only exacerbated in recent years. Additionally, in various country, Vietnam included, forests are being destroyed by real estate companies so they can be turned into golf courses. Therefore, in order to alter the situation, there is a need for policy changes, as well as stricter surveillance and stronger effort for conservation from the government. Though it is said that the government's plans are usually slow in execution, they are still the key to sustainable transformation. Furthermore, big corporations with economic resources have a big influence over politicians' decisions, and in turn, their policies. With the determination of these companies to contribute to the environment, nature conservation efforts can be accelerated by a great deal.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that not only do our politicians, governmental institutions and private corporations can improve our environment, normal people also possess the ability to do so. Ultimately, as a society, we need all the effort we can get, in order to make our planet a better place to inhabit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | Đỗ Anh Tuấn | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... few years back, after having collected a large number of petitions from other Hanoians. Because ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44871794872 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2952469107 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6710498526 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.8125 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152026876669 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479529035621 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330483931154 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933619187787 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306365642107 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.