The passage and lecture are both talking about United Kingdom artifacts. The writer states three reasons which participate in limitation of these artifacts. The lecturer in the other hand, casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, Non of these reason are convenience.
First, the author says, important artifacts were lost to construction projects. Moreover, in in rate of population demand increase in building. digging new building destroied artifacts. This statement is challenged by professor. She mentions. perfect examination should did before any construction to be sure there is no valuble artifact in working field. Furthermore, government do the best to preserve these lucrative artifacts.
Second, the passage illustrates to inadequate of financial support to archaelogy field. The lecturer refutes this argument. She points to companies that support archaeoloical working. In addition, the government not responsible for this finance. Therefore this reason is incorrect .
Third, the writer says, getting career in archaeoloy field is very difficult. Many people who want to become archaeologists ended up. They do archaeological reaesrch only as volunteers. This point contradicts by professor. She contents, Government empyloo a lot of archaeologists. So, it encourage people who interested with this job. As a result, threr are many artifact that can be found by these people.
As a conclusion, reason which were mentioned in passage are incorect .
The passage and lecture are both talking about United Kingdom atrifacts. The writer states three reasons which participate in limitation of these artifacts. The lecturer in the other hand, casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, Non of these reason are convenience.
First, the author says, important artifacts were lost to construction projects. Moreover, in in rate of population demand increase in building. digging new building destroied artifacts. This statement is challenged by professor. She mentions. perfect examination should did before any construction to be sure there is no valuble artifact in working field. Furthermore, government do the best to preserve these lucrative artifacts.
Second, the passage illustrates to inadequate of financial support to archaelogy field. The lecturer refutes this argument. She points to companies that support archaeoloical working. In addition, the government not responsible for this finance. Therefore this reason is incorrect .
Third, the writer says, getting career in archaeoloy field is very difficult. Many people who want to become archaeologists ended up. They do archaeological reaesrch only as volunteers. This point reputs by professor. She contents, Government empyloee a lot of archaeologists. So, it encourage people who interested with this job. As a result, threr are many artifact that can be found by these people.
As a conclusion, reason which were mentioned in passage are incorect .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-02 | talelaldabous | 63 | view |
- The passage and lecture are discussing the possibility of using stars as navigation by humpback whales The author claims there are evidence explain that humpback use stars for navigation The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions these 80
- The reading and lecture about making a strict rules for handiling and storing coalk ash The representative companies of power have opposite veiw they argue that new regulation are not important and may cause negative consequent First the pwer company say 61
- The internet has neumerous benifits to all aspects of our life especialy with the evolution that occur in the tehnological field Therefor I think government should provide a free internat access for their citizens as other crucial things like roads and bu 76
- The reading passage and the lecture are both discussing accurecy of Robert E Peary expedation to North Pole The writer claims three evidences to express that Peary did reach the North Pole The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in articl 71
- The passage and lecture are both disscusing uses of great house of Chaco canyon settelments The writer claims three possible uses of these houses The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article He says these suggestive uses are unsupportive First the 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both talking...
^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ipate in limitation of these artifacts. The lecturer in the other hand, casts doubt...
^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...claim made in article. She mentions, Non of these reason are convenience. First...
^^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...ost to construction projects. Moreover, in in rate of population demand increase in b...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Digging
...population demand increase in building. digging new building destroied artifacts. This ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perfect
... challenged by professor. She mentions. perfect examination should did before any const...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'company'.
Suggestion: company
...er refutes this argument. She points to companies that support archaeoloical working. In ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nment not responsible for this finance. Therefore this reason is incorrect . Third, the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ance. Therefore this reason is incorrect . Third, the writer says, getting caree...
^^
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encourages'?
Suggestion: encourages
...mpyloee a lot of archaeologists. So, it encourage people who interested with this job. As...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun artifact seems to be countable; consider using: 'many artifacts'.
Suggestion: many artifacts
...d with this job. As a result, threr are many artifact that can be found by these people. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct that can be found by these people. As a conclusion, reason which were menti...
^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h were mentioned in passage are incorect .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, in addition, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69090909091 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13014773643 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663636363636 0.540411800872 123% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 9.0 21.2450331126 42% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.8572779064 49.2860985944 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 54.4347826087 110.228320801 49% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 9.5652173913 21.698381199 44% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.47826086957 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40805918892 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910304583763 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118710961782 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237125923782 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.258419311055 0.0443174109184 583% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.88 53.8541721854 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.24 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 5.6 10.498013245 53% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.