The pie charts below show the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
The pie charts reveal statistics about the proportion of money spent on various categories by each family in Japan and Malaysia, in 2010.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is evident that expenses for accommodation accounted for the largest percentage in Malaysia, whereas that figure for Japan was reported by the transport sector. Moreover, people in these two countries paid the least for health care.
The rate of expenditure varied for most categories. Housing expenses accounted relatively high proportion in both Malaysia and Japan, with 34% and 21%, respectively. The highest average household expenditure in Japan was on other goods and services at 29%, compared to 26% in Malaysia. The percentage of money that a Japanese family paid for transport followed closely at 20%, doubled that of Malaysia.
Turning to other segments, Japan’s fraction of budget used for food was 24%, which was slightly lower than that figure for the remaining country, at 27%. The former claimed the smallest spending on health care with just 6%; however, it was still twice as high as the number for the latter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
- The table shows oil production in Africa countries from 2000 to 2004 unit barrels 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 100
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 67
- The charts show the spending of a school in 1981 1991 and 2001 5 lines 3 n m 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22346368715 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71173667746 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625698324022 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2780394788 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197305730768 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883942612587 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909144794677 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13376167729 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991297987718 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.