The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given chart compares the population percentage and the respective wealth contribution to the world of various regions.
Overall, it is evident that some countries account for very high proportions of the world’s GDP despite their low population fractions. Other nations, however, show reversed trends.
Having just around 6% of the world’s population, North America still boasts over a third of the global wealth. An akin situation can be noticed in rich Asia Pacific nations which comprises merely 5% of the worldwide population but contributing a quarter to the world wealth. Europe countries also follow this pattern with the percentage of wealth doubles this figure of population.
On the contrary, the distribution of wealth to the remaining regions is quite low compared with their share of the population. China shows the maximum different level in these two categories. This Asian country includes approximately 25% global population while its wealth contribution is only 3%. The situation is also striking in India where the population is 16% of the world but the wealth is meagerly 1%. Latin America and Carribean countries see the least difference at about 2.5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-28 | mytinh | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-26 | Surbhi96 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | Trangdodo | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | Samathanary | 78 | view |
- The charts show the spending of a school in 1981 1991 and 2001 5 lines 3 n m 56
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries Summarise the information by sele 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Two maps show the change of a coastal town called Pentland from 1950 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 80
- The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion to the world of various regions. Overall, it is evident that some countri...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ations, however, show reversed trends. Having just around 6% of the world’s pop...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th doubles this figure of population. On the contrary, the distribution of wea...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, third, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39247311828 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84705213545 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.985275538 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1818181818 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165222146598 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633839158829 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420380773803 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101597706851 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558786307336 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion to the world of various regions. Overall, it is evident that some countri...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ations, however, show reversed trends. Having just around 6% of the world’s pop...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th doubles this figure of population. On the contrary, the distribution of wea...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, third, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39247311828 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84705213545 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.985275538 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1818181818 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165222146598 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633839158829 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420380773803 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101597706851 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558786307336 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.