The maps below show changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day.
The pictures show the ground floor of an art gallery at two different stages in its
development: 2005 and at present. It is readily obvious that most features of the gallery
have been altered, except for the three exhibition rooms on the right, and the main
changes involve the replacement and addition of new facilities, making the art gallery
become more modern.
Looking at the left of the map, in 2005, there was a café in the northwest of the gallery’s
ground floor which has been replaced by a shop. Similarly, a vending machine has been
put on the site of the original gallery office. In the southwest of the floor, the exhibition
room 4 has been separated into a temporary exhibition room and an area for children.
Regarding the centre, a new lift has also been added between the stairs and the
exhibition room 3. Likewise, the receptionist area with a table and two chairs has been
moved to the center of the ground floor from the corner of the entrance hall. Meanwhile,
the appearance of a wheelchair ramp outside the gallery has enabled disabled travellers
to enter the floor space.
Turning to the right, no changes are seen in the layout of the exhibition room 1, 2 and
3 on the right side of the ground floor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | chichinn | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | Manh1003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | @helloooooo.1234 | 11 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | nnglinh | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The maps show changes in the local industrial village in England called Stamdorf between 1985 and 2015 You should spend 20 minutes on this task Write more than 150 words 68
- The maps below show changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day 84
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, look, regarding, similarly, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74885844749 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5774142384 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543378995434 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.848504627 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 3.83414634146 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310663939199 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124529743935 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100610696035 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103106186254 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828301440303 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.