The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe. The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph provides data on the unemployment levels of Spain, Germany and Italy from 1995 to 2005 while the table demonstrates the proportion of male and female in the workforce of these countries in the year 1991.
In 1991, Spain had the highest unemployment rate at about 13%. And then, it experienced a spike before hovering at 18% between 1993 and 1995. From 1995 onwards, a general change could be seen in the situation with the marginal drop of this figure to nearly 9% at the end of the said period. On the contrary, Germany saw a reversed pattern, it started at 4 percent but showing some minor fluctuations and peaking at almost 12% by 2005. Italy’s rate oscillated less than these two nations, starting and finishing at 8% over time and reaching a maximum of 12% during the period 1997 and 1999.
Regarding the table, in 1991, just over half of the Germany women were working compared with three-quarters of men. But in Spain, just under a third of the females were employed and a third of the males were not. Italy saw the similar pattern with the propotion of men and women in the workforce were 77.1% and 37.8% respectively.
Overall, the percentage of citizens who were out of job in Italy and Spain showed downward trends whereas this segment of Germany saw an upward trajectory.
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The charts show the spending of a school in 1981 1991 and 2001 5 lines 3 n m 56
- The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of these countries in the year 1991. In 1991, Spain had the highest unemploym...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 12% during the period 1997 and 1999. Regarding the table, in 1991, just over ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rce were 77.1% and 37.8% respectively. Overall, the percentage of citizens who ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, then, third, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70434782609 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56810449175 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595652173913 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1637860696 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187982714016 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718955686716 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667127973188 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110651146385 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666984347327 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.