The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day.
The presented map illustrated the transformations in the art gallery ground floor between 2005 and the current layout.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that the gallery witnessed significant changes, including the replacement of exhibition room 4 and providing some new areas on the floor.
It can be seen that the right side of the ground remained unchanged throughout the years. Meanwhile, on the left side, exhibition room 4 has been removed for the construction of a temporary exhibition, and a separate area for children. The space that was originally used for the gallery office was converted into a vending machine, as the office is relocated to the top-left side, replacing the cafe.
A new lift is added next to exhibition room 3, and the current layout includes an entrance hall as well. While there is no change occurred to the entrance, the receptionist was moved next to the temporary exhibition, located in the centre of the ground.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-18 | nnglinh | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | TranMinhDuc | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | Trangdodo | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | Trangdodo | 67 | view |
- Many people believe that good planning is the key factor to success in life while others believe that other factors like hard work or luck are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day 84
- Given high unemployment rate it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education What do you think 78
- the graph below show the value of clothing exported from bangladesh between 1998 and 2012 and the pie chart shows the destination and value of exported clothing in 2012 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comp 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08176100629 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96626070718 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.471800279 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176994806083 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866072419514 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114671045944 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133847706157 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129137500356 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.