Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is a fact of modern society that commercials have been becoming increasingly popular in people’s life. Despite some drawbacks, I think this phenomenon should be considered as progress due to its tremendous merits.
Critics of the advertising industry point out a host of reasons. First and foremost, advertisements are more likely to become a tool for producers to exaggerate the attributes of their products, which leads to various problems. To illustrate, many gullible customers would buy low-quality products whose values are overstated on social networking websites like Facebook, which not only make them feel annoying but also deteriorate their health in many cases. Furthermore, the amount of expenditure spent on advertising is too high, being attributed to the escalation of living costs. One way to explain this is that sellers would pass on advertising fees to end consumers in form of higher prices of their items.
Advocates, however, assert that the ubiquity of commercials is conducive to rising living standards and enormous job opportunities. Regarding the former, the widely-spread of advertisement would keep people well-informed about diverse products that may help them find it easier to choose suitable things. Turning to the latter, the development of the advertising industry paves the way for new vacancies for a huge number of people, especially those who can think outside the boxes or who master computer skills. It is exemplified by an ever-increasing number of young graduates getting well-paid jobs in marketing companies thanks to being competent in particular fields like editing or designing.
In conclusion, in spite of the downsides associated with exaggeration and higher prices, this trend still should be seen as a welcome development when it comes to convenience and lucrative careers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | MEBC Class | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 89
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries Summarise the information by sele 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... form of higher prices of their items. Advocates, however, assert that the ubiq...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, well, i think, in conclusion, in particular, in many cases, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49116607774 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14117779897 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671378091873 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5948107506 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126879646989 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423054273443 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453394680967 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623969598512 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301892090967 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.