Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, when recruiting a new staff, some employers state that life experience or personalities of an individual is not as vital as formal academic qualifications as it can save them time in hiring process. In my opinion, I believe this is a downward progress because many unfortunate talents are going to be wasted.
Employers have a biased favor in choosing candidates with qualifications over their experience in life or traits because it allows them to spend less time searching new employees. It is extremely difficult to select right candidates in thousands of available applicants on the market, and typically, companies do not have enough time to look through every CV when they are in shortage of staff. Therefore, qualifications are viewed as an evident to show for employers that individuals have gained related knowledge or have a general comprehension of the position they are applying. Ultimately, this helps them to remove a large number of irrelevant profiles, and the procedure of recruitment becomes easier and faster.
However, abusing this employing method can cause a detrimental effect which wastes plenty of talents. Some individuals living in such a harsh financial condition are often blocked to access to formal education. In order to make up for the loss of qualifications, they have to join in the workforce in their early age to obtain necessary skills and practical knowledge of the working field they are pursuing. Unfortunately, experts have shown that every year, millions of those talents are often neglected by companies because of lacking certain qualifications, and consequently, this forces them to opt for other manual or white-shirt jobs in factories.
In conclusion, although looking for new candidates relied primarily on qualifications can be beneficial for companies in speeding up the employment process, this can affect negatively on the workforce which many talents are left behind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- Many think that religion should be taught in schools while others think it should be avoided Discuss both sides and give your opinion 95
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 67
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 78
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities others however say that would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both views and give your own opinion 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... time in hiring process. In my opinion, I believe this is a downward progress bec...
^
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtunate talents are going to be wasted. Employers have a biased favor in choosin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
.... Ultimately, this helps them to remove a large number of irrelevant profiles, and the procedure ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, look, so, therefore, as for, in conclusion, in fact, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39144736842 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16161889777 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1330461278 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22961382174 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817508795648 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750171458769 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145482282532 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426770881197 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.