Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
Looking for new employees in this era have to think that the formal academic qualification is more crucial than personal qualities or life experience. This is because formal academic qualification is regarded as a standard of recruitment, but this can have a negative side due to there is no guarantees about personal qualities.
Nowadays, there are many collaborations between the companies with university to do some projects about the vital topics. Therefore, the university will play be role to provide human resource to the company. It is a good idea in order to the company do not be difficult to find new employees. What is the consequence of this issue? This can have a positive impact in reducing the number of unemployed where we know that the number of unemployed are developing in this era especially in the developing countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, and Cambodia. Based on research held by scholars of Harvard University, in 2022 almost 80% graduation from university in the developing countries have worked in companies especially mining sector. This percentage have increased since 2020.
However, this issue has negative side about personal qualities of the workers. Most of graduation from the university did not have much experiences. They only know about theoretical, so most of companies tend to spend time and money to train new workers about basic of works. For example, in Morowali Mining Company, one of the biggest mining company in Indonesia has to spent their income around 20 billion rupiah to give training every year. And the company is only experiencing to increase about 5% of income in the past 5 years.
In conclusion, formal academic qualification as a standard for recruitment is a good requirement, but if it is possible the companies or recruiters should consider about life experiences or personal qualities as new employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away Causes and problems 61
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no guarantees'?
Suggestion: there are no guarantees
...ut this can have a negative side due to there is no guarantees about personal qualities. Nowadays, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...uation from the university did not have much experiences. They only know about theor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the companies') or simply say ''most companies''.
Suggestion: most of the companies; most companies
...s. They only know about theoretical, so most of companies tend to spend time and money to train n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18481848185 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00955356689 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53795379538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6649242165 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.733333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233655941121 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754804755677 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117522002248 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173970652833 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117787336747 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no guarantees'?
Suggestion: there are no guarantees
...ut this can have a negative side due to there is no guarantees about personal qualities. Nowadays, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...uation from the university did not have much experiences. They only know about theor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the companies') or simply say ''most companies''.
Suggestion: most of the companies; most companies
...s. They only know about theoretical, so most of companies tend to spend time and money to train n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18481848185 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00955356689 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53795379538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6649242165 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.733333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233655941121 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754804755677 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117522002248 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173970652833 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117787336747 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.