People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
Nowadays, the question of whether or not the government should increase the cost of fuel for transport vehicles has become a source of controversy due to its substantial impact on human life. Although this policy appears attractive, the disadvantage will be far more significant.
There are compelling reasons why the government raises the price of fuel for vehicles in order to ameliorate environmental contamination.
First, if the petrol, gas and oil are more expensive than in the past; there will less people burning them for commuting demand. This means that, CO2 emissions will decline dramatically, which leads to curbing the greenhouse efforts and global warming.
Second, by raising the cost of fuel, this money can be invested in reducing the quantity of pollutants in the earth. For example, the government will have more funding for upgrade pollutant treating system, which protects the environment.
On the other hand, I would argue that the government should have other policies to enhance environmental problems.
First, in order to decline air pollution, the road congestion charges are necessary. In fact, the people tend to change transport from the private to public, which will make be limit the traffic on the road.
Second, by using the budget country, the government will have funding for research projects to find out eco-friendly power sources, such as wind and solar energies, which creates cutting down emissions and increasing environmentally friendly.
In conclusion, although the government thinks that they should increase the petrol prices for vehicles but I personally think that we need other solutions to enhance our environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 56
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of difference of different age group in a European country on different TV programme in 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, the question of whether or not...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Nowadays, the question of whether or not the government should increase t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dvantage will be far more significant. There are compelling reasons why the gov...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... expensive than in the past; there will less people burning them for commuting deman...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stem, which protects the environment. On the other hand, I would argue that th...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increasing environmentally friendly. In conclusion, although the government t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44230769231 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90311758563 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603846153846 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7818931371 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319761830318 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113418916128 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09982723506 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1524230506 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876521246704 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.