Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don’t know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
It is commonly known that many regions across the globe have seen huge economic and technological changes over the past few decades, and those who are fortunate enough to experience these developments are sure to have discerned diverse changes that ensue in our lives. The issue has been raised whether people today are readier to help strangers than they were in the past. As far as I am concerned, people are more willing to offer their help to those who they don’t know.
First of all, people are more prepared to help others because they are more financially capable of doing so. In the past, most individuals earned just enough to support their family, and they probably didn’t think that they needed to help strangers with similar financial status. However, with the development of the economy, although the gap between rich and poor is widening, more members of society, especially the affluent, are aware of this social problem and are glad to make donations to help those in need. For example, many wealthier individuals now donate clothes that they no longer need to people somewhere else who are still struggling with the cold.
Second, technology connects different groups of society and makes it easier to help strangers. Before the invention of the Internet, some people were probably reluctant to make donations because it was difficult to know who they were going to help and whether their donations would reach those who needed them. However, today photographs and videos can be transmitted fast online, and this provides an easy way for helpers to keep track of their donations and even see them put in the hands of those who receive help. Another example is Wikipedia. Users spend time writing and editing, sharing their information and ideas with strangers from all over the world. A man offering his edition of an entry on Wikipedia in New York may be giving great help to millions of people across the globe. Without technology, this would not be so easy.
Third, the tremendous sense of self-worth that a person gains through online feedback also contributes to more helping behaviors. If a man provides a popular answer to a question on Quora, then he will likely feel a strong and long-lasting sense of self-worth because many people from different places keep reading his answer and giving him upvotes, signs that show their agreement with his answer. This is a simple feedback mechanism made possible by today’s technology, but it creates a strong sense of pride in helpers by showing them that many readers have benefited from their answers. The more individuals they help, the prouder they feel. This is the driving force behind the increasing number of such seemingly altruistic acts online.
In conclusion, today’s people are more willing to help those they don’t know. This is because some of them get wealthier than the others, and technology has also encouraged many good deeds on the Internet.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, third, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2460.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01018329939 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51056973928 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537678207739 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8021665351 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.380952381 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390844527606 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125648609649 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113975124991 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238426121678 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643556253533 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.