In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
In our rather futuristic society, it is of note that the past of accomodations is appealing to an increasing number of dwellers. With the help of rapidly elder people and local authority, residents could easily figure out the historical information of their house or building. This essay will analyse reasons for this eagerness, and how residents might achieve their goals.
When it comes to the reasons for tracing historical background related to the house people dwell in, demands for understanding construction process as well as the information of the previous owner should be taken into considerations. To illustrate, new owner could easily deduce main features of the house from the events eventuaring inside the house. Construction process and achitectural design, whereby we might grasp fully intentions of designers and superiority of each space in our house, must be investigate properly. Furthermore, it could be infered the suitablity of an accomodation for us from the profile of the previous residents us. For example, according to some public research on connection between hobbies and accomodation, almost every interviewee would prefer to choose house possessing features associated with their hobbies rather than purchasing an accomodation not convienietly supporting their interests.
However, lightening some historical facts of a building is such an arduous task when it requires more time and endeavors to carry out. Fortunately, the source of information obtained from surrounding elder people and the local authority seems to be authentic when they are considered two prevalent choices. On the one hand, those living in the same neighborhood for a long period have witnessed significant changes in every corner of their place, therefore, they have a broad spectrum of knowledge about historical events sued to our house. Moreover, local authority tends to track for inner area’s construction and neighbourly events, which could supply local people with background information of building’s location.
In conclusion, all the tendencies of reasearching on the past of a house or building only aim at enhancing living experience inside their new accomodation. This can be achieved through thoroughly pondering local source of information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the plan of a medical center in 2008 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
- The government spends about 220 million pounds a year supporting museums and galleries in the UK and a similar amount subsidizing the visual and performing arts This is a huge sum to spend on minority interests and the money would be better spent on more 69
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 67
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature Write a 150 word description of this diagram for a university lecturer
- Some individuals feel that working from home while of benefits for employees is actually drawbacks for employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 789, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to house'
Suggestion: to house
...very interviewee would prefer to choose house possessing features associated with the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5988372093 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12995415846 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578488372093 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0645261563 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.571428571 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238583849907 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746555474145 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510174157481 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140971890809 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315702684806 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.