Some people believe that for school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than parents. Others argue that parents are not less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While it is believed that teachers have the greatest impact on students’ intellectual and social development, opponents of this argue that parents are of equal importance in educating their children. Despite some rationales behind both ways of thinking, I strongly advocate that both groups of people can make considerable contributions to a child’s general development.
On the one hand, there are justifications for the notion that teachers are the most influential figure in a school child’s development. First and foremost, lectures are considered to be the deliverer of lessons, enriching students’ knowledge on a variety of subjects at school. As a result, students tend to look up to them and follow their example as standard behaviors. Additionally, once children have started schooling, most of their time are allocated to being near friends and teachers. In such an academic environment, they are more likely to be significantly affected by school staff. Therefore, it is suggested that students are more influenced by teachers’ manners.
On the other hand, parents are also believed to play a pivotal role in their children’s learning process. This can be attributed to the fact that parents are the ones who offered them their first life lessons, which means that, even though children have been to school, they will always rely on their parents for advice on certain troublesome situations encountered at some points of their life. Moreover, generally speaking, parents are often closest people in the children’s minds. Therefore, students have a tendency to share their problems, which may include academic shortcomings, with parents, giving them the chance to understand their children more and have appropriate approach to children’s education. Fore the aforementioned reasons, parents can have equally tremendous effects on kids’ intelligence and social development.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the compelling arguments behind both views, I believe that children can benefit from a combination of formal education and home schooling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-12 | kimtaeyeons | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | Cynthia Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-15 | trongtin611 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Grace Le | 84 | view |
- Some people think that movies should only be for entertainment Others think that they should also have educational values Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government s responsibility Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or a negative development 84
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...votal role in their children’s learning process. This can be attributed to the fact tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66453674121 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15531077348 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581469648562 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5944654371 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.642857143 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416633884199 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130154454564 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759575020962 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219904465538 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116254672594 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.