Many animals are endangered. Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many parts of the world, endangered animals are on the verge of extinction. Many hold a belief that individuals and governments should only preserve species that are economically beneficial to humans. However, to the best of my knowledge, all animals that are being threatened should be protected for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that the interdependence of species is the main characteristic of eco-balance. Nowadays, many zoological studies have shown that although it is invisible, the survivals of living species are closely intertwined in one way or another. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that the underpopulation of one species is accompanied by demise of other species. For example, poisonous snakes are regarded as dangerous animals; however, the extinction of snakes in farming regions has resulted in the overpopulation of rats, which have chronic effects on agricultural yields. This example is the illustration of the fact that all animals should be preserved.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that we should only protect useful animals, because governments and individuals that are on the tight budget have to spend money on various social aspects, typically education and medication. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that despite high expenses of animal preservation, deterring the extinction of endangered species is widely regarded as the top priority of governments. Furthermore, we are not able to predict the future and some species that are classified as unuseful to humans.
In conclusion, all animals in danger of extinction should be protected for the reasons mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of households with different kinds of technology in the UK from 1997 to 2001 89
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France Russia and American between 2000 and 2015 49
- The chart below shows changes in water levels of reservoirs in 6 cities in Australia between 2009 and 2010 10
- The pie charts below show the proportions of energy produced from 5 sources in a country in 1995 and 2003
- People used to live in the same city throughout their lives but now they change where they live several times What is the cause Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...animals are on the verge of extinction. Many hold a belief that individuals and governmen...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40794223827 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20829169202 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541516245487 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7779788196 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242401297182 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860466008741 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608924592977 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161039767321 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706622823718 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.