The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
The first line graph illustrates how many people use train between 2000 and 2009 while the second one gives information about the proportion of trains running on time compared to the target.
Overall, the number of train passengers slightly fluctuated over the course of 9 years and the highest figure was seen in 2005. However, the percentage of trains running on schedule had a more violent fluctuation in comparison with the station's goal.
In 2000, there were about 37 million individuals who chose to commute by train. This number then rose approximately 5 million in the next two years but suddenly dropped to the number that nearly equal to the starting point. After that, it reached a peak at 47 million passengers in 2005 and fall steadily to 40 million commuters before recovered to 42 million users in the last year.
The proportion of on-time train was quite low in 2000, just at 92%, lower than the standard line 3%. This figure then rose significantly in a row of four years until it recorded 1% higher than the target. However, it eventually fell sharply to the percentage that similar to the first point before having a dramatic increase and plateauing at 97% in the last two years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | phanhhh | 73 | view |
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 84
- environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- The diagram shows production of sugar by a german company for supermarkets and restaurants 100
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stations'' or 'station's'?
Suggestion: stations'; station's
...lent fluctuation in comparison with the stations goal. In 2000, there were about 37 mi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to 42 million users in the last year. The proportion of on-time train was quit...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80676328502 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57052953978 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613526570048 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3947582196 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34176270422 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127922573679 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113280591795 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212325049366 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125546986951 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.