The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
The table illustrates the number of male and female workers as well as factories in the course of 50 years, starting in 1851.
Overall, it can be seen that employee rate experienced a downward trend over the period shown but the opposite was true for the figures for factories. It is also noticeable that total employees was the highest in 1851 whereas the number of factories was the lowest in the same year.
In 1851, male and female staffs were 287100 and 190000 respectively. Both of these figures fall gradually from 1861 to 1901. The numbers significantly dropped to 31000 and 30000 at the end of the period and the differences in the male group was more dramatic than the female one.
Regarding the number of factories that underwent an upward trend in general. The initial number was 225 in 1851, after which it reached a peak of 721 in 1881 before having a fluctuation in the next ten years. This figure plunged by 96 and continue to fall to 600 in the last year.
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 84
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram shows production of sugar by a german company for supermarkets and restaurants 100
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes from three different sources between 1990 and 2005 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntinue to fall to 600 in the last year.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, well, whereas, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 937.175257732 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57714285714 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47435829653 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 127.690721649 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 290.88556701 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5384965262 44.8134815571 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 16.8248392259 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 4.34317383033 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236960633765 0.216113520407 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927290130483 0.0766984524023 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647485188926 0.0603063233224 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141269961205 0.12726935374 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036561548458 0.0580467560999 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 8.37731958763 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 70.7449484536 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 8.71597938144 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 7.59969072165 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 41.2886597938 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.