whether traveling to local cities is fruitful or to foreign countries | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

whether traveling to local cities is fruitful or to foreign countries

One of the most controversial subjects, which often provoke many discussions is fruitful consequences of traveling. Some people keep endorsing the claim that traveling to different places in one’s own country has more benefits whereas others dismiss thus this idea be believing that traveling abroad is more advantageous. It is my firm conviction that foreign trips bring about more benefits. In what follows, I will thoroughly elucidate what rationale my perspective based on.
The first and most significant reason why it is recommended to have at least a few foreign travels is that visiting a new country brings about an opportunity to experience and become familiar with different cultures. To begin with, each region and country has its own specific traditions based on their culture which is noticeably different from our own experience. It is disputable that all these traditions and cultures are rationally according to moral or religious basics which can affect our behavior and provide us with lessons for having a better life. I am sure that being familiar with various costumes and ethics can change our perspective positively. My own experience as a tourist is a compelling example of this claim. When I travelled to turkey, I faced Turkish habits of feeding homeless cats and dogs in streets. After evaluating this tradition that originated from their religious taught, I made my mind to follow it and instead of ignoring and driving them away, help these animals and feed them.
The second pivotal vindicating point I should mention here is that by traveling to foreign countries one can visit attractive and different natural attractions special to that region. It is obvious that each part of the world holds outstanding natural treasures in it which some of them are scarce in other places. Take my own experience as an example, once I traveled to Thailand, it is no means an exaggeration to state that I was shocked by its breathtaking nature. Since my homeland is located in hot and dry region, the tropical climate and forests of Thailand was really fascinating for me. Tropical forests which was dense high trees specific to that climate, canoes passing blue and transparent rivers going through theses bushy forests was an experience that could never be touched in my own country.

To put in a nutshell, traveling to foreign countries can always provide us benefits. Their specific costumes and traditions teach us more lessons and can persuade us to get accustomed to some of their positive habits that play a staple role in our life. Other than that, special nature and treasures located in different places should be experienced by every habitant of this world.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2021-07-14	zahra.tmmm	90	view
2021-05-31	talelaldabous	70	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user zahra.tmmm :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s whereas others dismiss thus this idea be believing that traveling abroad is more advantage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, so, thus, whereas, at least, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09954751131 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78857878839 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552036199095 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0420522164 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.631578947 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2631578947 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141221082272 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047201683185 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632532423218 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935496455814 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256857314456 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.