Write about the following topic:
Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
People have different opinions as to whether nations should allot huge amounts of money for hosting international sports events. Personally I believe that organizing such events has number of beneficial impacts on a nation.
Advocates of the former view might declaire that spending on sporting events could hurt countries’ economies. Running such international competitions as the World Cup or UEFA Euro can saddle the host countries with debts. This is because the breakdown of the sum of fees includes enhancing the infrastructure and capacity of their stadiums, implementing higher levels of security, and hiring performance artists for opening and closing ceremonies. For example, South Africa spent billions of dollars hosting the 2010 World Cup and then drowned in debt. Instead, those budgets should have been expended in improving the standard of living, eliminating starvation, and creating a better life for their people.
However, I support the view that nations might reap more of the benefits of hosting those sporting events. Firstly, there are more job opportunities during years of planning and investment, thus contributing to a decrease in unemployment and building a prolific workforce. Secondly, those events could create enthusiasm and excitement for hosting nations’ people. It is clear from this encouragement that it will help to promote their emotional well-being. Lastly, hosting those occasional events can provide an enormous boost to tourism in host countries. With stadiums thronged with sports supporters during the events, considerable numbers of souvenirs and tickets are sold, generating huge profits.
In conclusion, I concur with the portion of people who holds that although hosting large sporting events can dig immensely into countries’ budgets, they, later on, benefit in terms of a myriad of employment opportunities and expenditure of foreign tourists who visit to watch the games
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 82
- Write about the following topic Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 84
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Other think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you support and why 70
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Write about the following topic Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
People have different opinions as to whether nations should allot huge amounts of mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6404109589 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95173495709 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630136986301 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9059028089 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186907409534 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630156980764 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458894566684 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115289951456 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270876384226 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.