Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries’ development. However,
other people hold the opposite opinion. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some adopt a view that holding sports events does a great job in boosting the country’s development. Neverthless, the objectors argue that it could bring about many problems. In this essay, justifications for both schools of thoughts will be discussed, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, it is noteworthy that sports events contribute significantly to local tourism industry. Studies have shown that successful organization of sports events, especially the ones on global scale, typically the Olympic Games and the World Cup is often accompanied by the upsurge in the number of foreign tourists. Accordingly, some domestic industries like catering, accommodation, transport and entertainment are promoted in leaps and bounds to satisfy the requirements of more visitors. Therefore, it will be a mistake to overlook the fact that holding sports events exerts conducive influences on host countries’ development.
On the other hand, the opponents may argue that it may be a waste of national financial budget to build facilities just for short-term use. According to studies, although some major sports events may attract a large number of visitors and increase tourism revenue, host countries have to invest huge financial sources in building new sports facilities and infrastructure, such as stadiums with larger capacities. However, when these sports events end, not all governments make good use of those new facilities, and many stadiums become unused. Obviously, this is a misspending, and the gains obtained from building such new facilities may not outweigh the losses caused.
Taking all of the above-mentioned facts into account, it is my opinion that host countries can benefit from holding sports events because of not only the economic gains but also the opportunity to communicate with the world. Hence, holding sports competitions will impose positive impacts on the country’s development in a long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | maiphuong0610 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | maiphuong0610 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | maiphuong0610 | 89 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 78
- People used to live in the same city throughout their lives but now they change where they live several times What is the cause Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 67
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 67
- People used to live in the same city throughout their lives but now they change where they live several times What is the cause Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 67
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...gh some major sports events may attract a large number of visitors and increase tourism revenue, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ot outweigh the losses caused. Taking all of the above-mentioned facts into account, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48657718121 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07848369235 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3002306952 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247187824626 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856496337836 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677347949828 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160445388325 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625242467495 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.