Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The speaker asserts that educators should find out what students want and then offer it to them. However, in my view, I think because educators’ responsibility is to help students in studying, any other requirement that will impede students from learning must be disapproved. And educators is capable of giving students all requirements they want. Thus, I strongly disagree with the speaker.
To begin with, educators must set a sign on developing experts, facilitating the development of the country. Teachers have to design a curriculum that adapts to students’ learning and know what is reasonable to help to learn. On the other hand, students should realize that educators agree with no all requests. If requests are irrational, teachers have to disapprove these requests. For example, when students want to learn how to create drugs, should chemistry teachers teach them? Teachers haven’t to approve all requests students want. In sum, since many requirements from students are unreasonable, teachers should not approve all requests students want.
Further, only a rational curriculum has a positive effect on students. Students lack experience, so they are unable to know what is best for learning. And then, students will raise an unreasonable request. Therefore, students’ requirements may have negative influence on studying, even backfiring on them. For instance, when students request teachers to delete many curriculums because many curricula are disinterested, this has an negative effect on studying. In brief, because students lack experience, which will cause them to raise unreasonable requests, teachers could disapprove these their requests.
Finally, the things that educators satisfy all students’ requirements is impossible. Students’ request is so changeable that educators is incapable of catching up with their mind. Although teachers can find out the some needs students wanting to know, maybe educators is unable to teach them this knowledge. Learning in high schools is an illustration to explain why teachers is incapable of teaching them some knowledge. If students want to know how the principle of a central processing unit operates, a part of a computer, many teachers in high school is capable of teaching them this complex thing. In a word, educators may not satisfy all requests from students.
To sum up, teachers have to reject some requests that raising from students. Since students lack experience, teachers could not agree with all requirements from the students, but offer a curriculum that really adapts to students. So, I strongly disagree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-10 | ashfaaq | 50 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | Vincent Samuel | 50 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | Evanica | 54 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | Gabriele_2605 | 79 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | saanri54321 | 66 | view |
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reas 50
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 58
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 58
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...hould realize that educators agree with no all requests. If requests are irrationa...
^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...y curricula are disinterested, this has an negative effect on studying. In brief, ...
^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ind. Although teachers can find out the some needs students wanting to know, maybe e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in brief, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51604938272 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96769580851 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446913580247 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7522482578 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9230769231 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5769230769 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239820509807 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834385858889 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592840726329 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155423663989 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447732179245 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.