Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. [Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.]
The speaker asserts that educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields that will prepare them for lucrative careers; To choose a promising fields could have an positive effect on students, because students are not unemployed after graduating. However, I disagree with the speaker. In my point of view, since Educators are responsible for developing country, encouraging students to choose the fields could impede country from prosperous; Therefore, the things that students choose only promising fields have negative effect on them; on the other hand, educators are incapable of encouraging students choose what promising fields are.
To begin with, educational institutions are responsible for considering whether encourage their students to choose a field that will prepare them for lucrative careers. The goals of schools are not encouraging students to choose promising fields but training experts. To make it clear, the United States is a good example. The United States’ education never encourage students to choose a field that seems promising, but encourage students to choose a fields that they want. Therefore, graduated students can find where they are going, and these students have a positive effect on the United States’ society. In sum, although educational institutions have the responsibility to determine the goals of education, they should not encourage students to choose only promising fields.
Further, encouraging students to choose a field has a negative effect on students. If all students choose the same fields that are promising, they will run into a surrounding of competition. The extremely condition could be an example of this point of view. If all students choose only one major, all students will focus on studying, fulfilling them to facilitate development of vocation; Just taking a break will cause students lose the competition, and there are no students enjoy studying; Nation is incapable of developing experts. On the other hand, if students only choose one field, other fields will be ignored. Then, there are a negative influence on country. In a word, educational institutions should not encourage students to choose the fields that are promising, but encourage students to choose the fields that they want.
Finally, encouraging students to choose major is impossible. Due to high development of society, educators are incapable of knowing what promising fields are; Another problems is that people hardly earn the money as others did because everyone is so different that we are unable to reproduce other’s success. Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is a good illustration. In past, the semiconductor is such a lower level work that most graduated students disliking going there. However, the semiconductor industry become prosperous now; most people didn’t expect to see that. In brief, educators are incapable of encouraging students to choice lucrative fields, since they are unable to know what lucrative fields are.
In sum, educators could not encourage students to choose the fields that are promising. And they is unable to know what promising fields are in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | TiOluwani97 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | PranaviN | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-25 | shashank__hegde | 33 | view |
| 2022-12-16 | Christiana Longe | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | yyh123 | 75 | view |
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years a recent survey of video game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed The survey asked v 57
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 58
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 50
- You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or a group Do you think a person s honest is the most important characteristic for being a leader 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'field'?
Suggestion: field
...ucrative careers; To choose a promising fields could have an positive effect on studen...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...To choose a promising fields could have an positive effect on students, because st...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to promise'.
Suggestion: to promise
... are not encouraging students to choose promising fields but training experts. To make it...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a field' or simply 'fields'?
Suggestion: a field; fields
...ising, but encourage students to choose a fields that they want. Therefore, graduated st...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ll students choose the same fields that are promising, they will run into a surrounding of co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 762, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rage students to choose the fields that are promising, but encourage students to choose the f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 41, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to major'
Suggestion: to major
...Finally, encouraging students to choose major is impossible. Due to high development ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 365, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...ductor industry is a good illustration. In past, the semiconductor is such a lower leve...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rage students to choose the fields that are promising. And they is unable to know what promis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...the fields that are promising. And they is unable to know what promising fields ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, then, therefore, in brief, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2692.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52772073922 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90144391111 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404517453799 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 832.5 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.9600067614 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2916666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340196476574 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125307678907 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108110255374 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231773801712 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878555747418 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.