Schools should stop using books for teaching and instead use films, TV and computers. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Today’s students see themselves as digital natives, the first generation to grow up surrounded by technology like smartphones, tablets and e-readers. The given statement comprises the view point that the use of books should be prohibited, instead digital media can be employed to teach to the students. Here, I would like to discord with the given statement.
Commencing with some points to endorse my view point, ŕeading printed books is more convenient, health friendly and reliable for the readers. To make it clear, vast study syllabus has to be covered by schools goers and it makes them study for prolong hours. One experiences strain in the eyes or headache if the content in digital form is read for a long time. More noticeably, the level of concentration declines when scrolling is required on frequent basis while learning through digital portals. Contrary to this, reading paper books neither puts strain into eyes nor hinders concentration.
Secondly, weak optics, wrist pain, and mental tiredness are the most obvious negative outcomes for readers sitting in front of computer screens for a long time. In case of books, one remains free from all such concerns. Unlike reading from books, Occurence of Technical glitches is an another nuisance, which disturbs the whole process of teaching and learning. Taking this into consideration, employing computers and television is believed to be less reliable. It is apparent that overlooking the importance of books in the presence of their alternatives is a fool's paradise.
Throwing lights on some more facts, the role of books in enhancing the imagination power and creative thinking is vital. Digital platforms might not be as effective as books in uplifting respective abilities. Books, for example, comprise only written content thereby readers get influenced to imagine the situation in order to have better understanding of the subject matter. By contrast, the availability of audio visual content on electronic apparatus restricts individuals to create or imagine situation or facts. Needless to say, books are more worthwhile than technological aids in terms of getting education.
To recapitulate, undeniably, aura of technology has made us believe that the quality of education can be better with the usage of gadgets; however, what benefits we would miss in the absence of books is something we should think about. In my perspective, books are more advantageous and should never be replaced by technological gadgets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-09 | ashkan zaheri | 93 | view |
- An English speaking friend wants to spend a two week holiday in your region and has written asking for information and advice Write a letter to your friend In your letter offer to find somewhere to stay give advice about what to do give information about 66
- Some people say that TV advertisements have benefits while others believe the opposite Discuss both views give your own opinion and include examples from your experience 81
- Some people think one should stay all their life in the same job, whereas others advocate changing jobs from time to time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 80
- Some people believe that it is impossible to help everyone in need around the world That is why governments should only focus on helping people of their own country To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and rele 65
- Some people think that school should teach students to understand right wrong and good behaviour instead of this being only parents responsibility Do you agree or disagree with the given statement 83
Comments
Hello sir/mam, ....why my…
Hello sir/mam, ....why my essays are not being checked by Human grader ??....report is only provided by essay E grader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iable for the readers. To make it clear, vast study syllabus has to be covered by...
^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a nuisance' or 'another nuisance'.
Suggestion: a nuisance; another nuisance
...oks, Occurence of Technical glitches is an another nuisance, which disturbs the whole process of te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 562, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fools'' or 'fool's'?
Suggestion: fools'; fool's
...the presence of their alternatives is a fools paradise. Throwing lights on some...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e should think about. In my perspective, books are more advantageous and should n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42602040816 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94841350227 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8829224105 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.35 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197294802131 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508075356612 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462990781368 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100250959747 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382535168613 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.