The graph below shows the percentage of people who travelled by bus in the UK from
2009 to 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features
and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table depicts the proportion of the UK people who travelling by bus for different purpose from 2009 to 2011.
Regarding the first year in 2009, 65 percentage of people travelled by bus for shopping. From then on, almost similar percentage of UK people used the bus for shopping, which was 56 % and 51 % respectively. The UK people, was not liked used the public transport for study in all the three years. After, communiting for work by bus was done 5 percentage in 2009. This percentage was decreased significantly by 2010 and the UK citizens did not give responsed used bus for work in 2011.
following this graph, a fifth used the bus for visiting friends in 2009 and 2010. This figure was increased around 23 % in 2011. Furthermore use of the bus for day tour done by around 7 % and the ratio of day tour was not changed after two years, as 2010 and 2011.
Overall, it can be seen that the use of public transport for swapping and visiting friends was the most popular among person for given three years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-29 | er rashmi | 78 | view |
2021-07-21 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
2021-07-21 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
2020-01-22 | Sadhanaraee | 71 | view |
2019-12-02 | Sarbjeet kaur | 83 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of people who travelled by bus in the UK from 2009 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- People say that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty but some other people argue that industrial is leading to poverty and it should be stopped discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
- Some people believe that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others believe that there are other factors Discuss both views and give your opinion 100
- People can eat a wide variety of food from other regions As a result they are eating a lot of foreign food instead of locally produced food Do you think the advantages of eating foreign foods are more than their harms 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...e responsed used bus for work in 2011. following this graph, a fifth used the bus for vi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...gure was increased around 23 % in 2011. Furthermore use of the bus for day tour done by aro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56284153005 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51616638043 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4538995861 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202031869043 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110805193016 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818750803696 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145370801313 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107956861781 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...e responsed used bus for work in 2011. following this graph, a fifth used the bus for vi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...gure was increased around 23 % in 2011. Furthermore use of the bus for day tour done by aro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56284153005 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51616638043 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4538995861 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202031869043 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110805193016 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818750803696 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145370801313 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107956861781 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.