Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Some people might think that putting restriction on research projects about science is a good idea; however, I am not agreed with the recommendation to stop the world revolution. If science will be stopped, how the world will stick together.
First of all, science can make the world better no matter what. For example, imagine Scientifics who have been creating Covid vaccine during past year and now. There are many examples of other vaccines for different diseases’ prevention. Thus, scientific development will usually make something good and new.
Additionally, all of current scientific discoveries relies on past knowledges because science is like chains all connected together. Thus, academies students and teachers always need to understand and use past scientific developments to be able to create new interventions. When a registered dietitian wants to recommend a new protein supplement for a resident, he/she will rely on her previous knowledge from his/her academy learning.
However, some people might believe that in some cases research restriction is necessary which can be true sometimes. Consider a crazy scientist who wants to create duplicated humans who can exactly look like real humans. In this case, an unethical scientific development should be stopped. Another example can be about Hiroshima atomic bomb that killed many people years ago. But even with these severe examples, we cannot blame the science because those humans who uses the science wrong should be blamed.
It might be true that unrestricted scientific researches will cause more problems than benefits, but we cannot just stop the science to prevent those problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 50
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 50
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 50
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, for example, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 258.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45736434109 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79727906116 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643410852713 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 704.065955056 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5744594106 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8666666667 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123010694277 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444183884684 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385237198868 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675220933371 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168929922556 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.