Increased people's life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement. One alternative is that people start to work at young age. Is this alternative a positive or negative development?
Escalating life expectancy of human being is considered as a reason for working more time till old age for financial management, starting work at young age is contemplated as an alternative. In my opinion, beginning work at little age has a lot of demerits, which will be discussed in the further paragraphs.
To commence with, joining work at young age may lead to excessive burden on workers. To explain it, in the initial years of life such as teenage, youngsters have to study while working in any premises can divert their mind from academics as well as enhances burden on their mind which will leads to reduce studying capabilities and mental abilities. For instance, in many nations students do part time work along with the study to manage their finances, also most of them are at risk of suffering from depression. Thus, working along with study can affect psychological state of a person.
Furthermore, maturity is of utmost importance for each and every work, which is not enough in early age workers. Being employed at young age may cause errors in chores, which can lead to fatal results. In addition, unemployment can also be increased as more vacancies will be filled if everyone starts work at an early age, no employment may available for rest of individuals. Thus, this alternative to save funds have major impact on employment chances.
To conclude, although starting work at an early years of life is imperative to save funds for later life, it is negative development because of above mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-28 | jotdhillon1510 | 73 | view |
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The best way to protect the environment is to use local resource such as food or building materials rather than transporting resources from other places To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The best way to protect the environment is to use local resource such as food or building materials rather than transporting resources from other places To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...r instance, in many nations students do part time work along with the study to manage the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at young age may cause errors in chores, which can lead to fatal results. In addi...
^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'year'?
Suggestion: year
...ude, although starting work at an early years of life is imperative to save funds for...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96887159533 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78576396256 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583657587549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9279666634 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.090909091 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330363437325 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130903357043 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573017076934 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208612020569 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306395930102 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.