Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The speaker asserts that teachers’ salaries should be based on students’ performance. It is true that higher salaries will spur teachers’ fighting spirit, which will improve quality of teaching. However, it also has negative influence on teachers and students. And the examination could not measure students’ condition. Thus, I strongly disagree with the speaker.
To begin with, the things that teachers’ salaries will rely on student’s academic performance has negative effect on teachers, since overly emphasizing scores will cause teachers’ course becoming utilitarian. Only focusing on scores makes teachers ignoring their responsibility: developing students. Lacking concentrating on characteristics and developing ability induces the quality of teaching decreasing. And another question is that teachers will contest for attracting more students. For example, teachers want to earn more money, they should attract more students. However, it is necessary to contest, because there a fixed number of students. In sum, teachers’ salaries should not rely on student’s performance.
On the other hand, the things teachers’ salaries depend on students’ performance exercise an negative influence in students, because students is incapable of learning using a correct attitude of study. Lacking a correct attitude of study impede students from developing. And students could not fulfilling them to facilitate development of vocation in the future. For instance, if students learn only one skill: getting high scores, the development of country will be impeded, since country full of those who lacks skill except for getting high scores. In a word, the things that teachers’ salaries rely on students’ performance will cause contrary effect on students, which will impede country from developing.
Finally, examination is not a useful way, because it is incapable of measuring students’ condition. And Scores couldn’t reflect students’ study condition; Perhaps students learn well but get lower scores in the test. For example, Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard after studying only six months. It is difficult to say that Bill Gates has a poor performance since he lacks academic study. In brief, because examination is unable to measure students’ condition, teachers’ salaries should not base on students’ academic performance.
To sum up, the things that teachers’ salaries depend on students’ performance has negative effect on teachers and students. And the examination is incapable of knowing students’ condition. I totally disagree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 50
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reas 50
- If a person wants to be successful he or she must be open minded to new ideas and willing to change his or her mind 66
- Modern agriculture methods damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed number of students. In sum, teachers’ salaries should not rely on student’s pe...
^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...epend on students’ performance exercise an negative influence in students, because...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to use'.
Suggestion: to use
...cause students is incapable of learning using a correct attitude of study. Lacking a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from developing. And students could not fulfilling them to facilitate developmen...
^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'fulfil', 'fulfill'
Suggestion: fulfil; fulfill
...rom developing. And students could not fulfilling them to facilitate development of vocat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, thus, well, except for, for example, for instance, in brief, it is true, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2241.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8664921466 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0589909747 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458115183246 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9586944984 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.64 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.28 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.12 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230098210064 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760667174973 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581765293827 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154294750792 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348296843083 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.17 12.1639044944 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.