Describe the given graph
The line graph illustrates how many congresses were organized in three particular places over 45 years, beginning in 1965.
Overall, it is clear that the surge changes in City C attracted a lot of attention. Meanwhile, both City B versus City A witnessed a downward trend.
It is striking that City C had an outstanding growth and reached its peak at approximately 29 conventions in 2010 compared with 0 was recognized in 1965. Besides, the number of congresses owned by City A dropped significantly to 20 in 1995, nearly twice as its highest starting point in the graph at 35. In 1995, there were 25 meetings held in City B followed by the number counting in City A, which was lower than slightly over 30 in 1965.
Firstly, the development that happened to City C was remarkable because of its taking off vogue. Secondly, the considered gap of fluctuations in City A was more likely to be pointed out by its unsustainable issues. The last one, City B's results lowered gradually during 45 years while it got two insignificant upward periods 1975-1985 and 1995-2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8670212766 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99087093726 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654255319149 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7199397858 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0379489636857 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0175150139578 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327869492041 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0293245075868 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333820919731 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.