Although, there is lot of translation software available, learning a language still could be advantage. To what extend do you agree or disagree ?
In modern era, technology is increasing day by day and it is too beneficial for human beings. There are plethora of softwares available for translation as well as learning new languages and skills. This notion have both pros and cons. I shed some light on both views in forthcoming paragraphs.
On the one side, there are ample of advantages to learn different languages. Some individuals migrate one place to another due to some business work and other reasons. They must need to know about their languages and culture before migration. For example, there are lot of aap in android and iphone mobile such as dictionary, gingle and so on, that companies provide free of cost these aaps for learning different languages and cultures. Whereas, some teenagers go to abroad for further studies or business work, they also use these type of aaps for learning foreign languages and about their cultural activities.
On the flip side, there are some disadvantages of this notion. It's most side effect is on tutors and native speakers. Some pupiles do not go to school and learn languages at home. Government should enforce the paid rule on these softwares and aaps. If these aaps would paid the individuals use less these once and go to school for learnings.
To conclude, although, there are enormous benefits of these aaps and these help to learn different languages, yet, there are also have some negative points.
- Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages therefore it is a wastage of time to learn a foreign languages To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more businesses as well as individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather being face to face Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 73
- Some people believe that technology such as mobile phones is destroying social interactions To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...g new languages and skills. This notion have both pros and cons. I shed some light o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'pay'
Suggestion: pay
...softwares and aaps. If these aaps would paid the individuals use less these once and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this once' or 'these onces'?
Suggestion: this once; these onces
...aps would paid the individuals use less these once and go to school for learnings. To co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ifferent languages, yet, there are also have some negative points.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96202531646 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59669591495 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.913546583 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137994172942 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505446780102 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664728883298 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831287728477 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195847387375 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.