A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is a common belief that people are judged according to social status and material possessions. As a result, there has been a controversy in public where some people indicate that old-fashioned values such as honor, kindness, and trust do not enough to judge someone. However, there are some worths - considering reasons for me to contradict that idea.
To begin with, it is admitted that a large number of people only care about wealth and social status when they make friends. That connection must receive them the benefit. For example, a person who kind, trust,.. but he is impoverished sometimes needs to make an efficient effort in making friends. By contrast, a person who displays weather, as there are plenty of benefits in a relationship.
But every coin has its two sides, the relationship that base on the benefit, can not go far. The traditional values like honesty, respect for each other, responsibility, kindness,... are playing an important role in modern life and every community. For instance, the employer always wants to hire a person who is honest and responsible for the job like an assistant, accountant,... Moreover, it is important to educate the children about the old values to help them have awareness about the social life. We can not judge someone just depend on the asset or social status.
In the conclusion, my firm conviction is that we can not judge someone base on social status and material possessions. It should be judge according to traditional values and modern values. Therefore, we should change our mindset about that for a beautiful future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | ThanhNT | 89 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 78
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of eletricity used according to the number of occupants Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 89
- The bar graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
.... To begin with, it is admitted that a large number of people only care about wealth and socia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...t. For example, a person who kind, trust,.. but he is impoverished sometimes needs...
^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
.... For example, a person who kind, trust,.. but he is impoverished sometimes needs ...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...or example, a person who kind, trust,.. but he is impoverished sometimes needs to m...
^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...for each other, responsibility, kindness,... are playing an important role in mode...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...or the job like an assistant, accountant,... Moreover, it is important to educate ...
^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'judged'?
Suggestion: judged
... and material possessions. It should be judge according to traditional values and mod...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85426239381 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1385409306 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3529411765 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218598860619 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671463612446 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601245808428 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133172179521 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482122819621 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
.... To begin with, it is admitted that a large number of people only care about wealth and socia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...t. For example, a person who kind, trust,.. but he is impoverished sometimes needs...
^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
.... For example, a person who kind, trust,.. but he is impoverished sometimes needs ...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...or example, a person who kind, trust,.. but he is impoverished sometimes needs to m...
^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...for each other, responsibility, kindness,... are playing an important role in mode...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...or the job like an assistant, accountant,... Moreover, it is important to educate ...
^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'judged'?
Suggestion: judged
... and material possessions. It should be judge according to traditional values and mod...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85426239381 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1385409306 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3529411765 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218598860619 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671463612446 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601245808428 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133172179521 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482122819621 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.