The reading passage and the lecture are both about eco-certification of wood companies in United State. The author claims three reasons to explain why these certification not important for wood companies in United State. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He contends, there are good reasons to obtain certification to these factories.
First of all, the writer states, American people see a lot of advertisement which are without take care of certification. They do not trust in advertising. This statement is challenged by professor. He mention, customers do not treat all advertisement in the same way. People distinguish between agencies, they trust independent organizations.
Second, the author asserts, eco-certified wood cost more than uncertified wood, because company should pay to have examined by certification agency. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this notion. He mentions, of courses every one take care about money. But, if the difference between prices is very small, then it is worth it to buy product with high quality which is little pit more expensive.
Finally, the reading passage argues, eco -certification need for trading with rest of world. Wood United State companies sell their product inside America. The lecturer contracts this point. He states, United State need this certification for competion with the forgin companies. If they do not do that, other forgin companies will crowded in United State market.
The reading passage and the lecture are both about eco-certification of wood companies in United State. The author claims three reasons to explain why these certification not important for wood companies in Unoted State. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He contends, there are good reasons to obtain certification to these factories.
First of all, the writer states, american people see a lot of advertisement which are without takecare of certification. They do not trust in advertising. This statement is challenged by professor. He mention, customers do not treat all advertisment in the same way. People distinguish between agenicies, they trust independent organizations.
Second, the author asserts, eco-certified wood cost more than uncertified wood, because company should pay to have examined by certification agency. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this notion. He mentions, of coures every one takecare about money. But, if the differance between prices is very small, then it is worthed to buy product with high quality which is littl pit more expensive.
Finally, the reading passage argues, eco -certification need for trading with rest of world. Wood United State companies sell their product inside America. The lecturer contracts this point. He states, United State need this certification for compettion with the forgin companies. If they do not do that, other forgin companies will crowded in United State market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
- Deciding futur career is a crucial thing that any indivitual concern whether in the past it was easier to identify what job would lead to successful futur or not This can be weighed in many aspects Some believe that in the past is very easy to figure out 66
- Many situation in our life need from as to make a decision Making this decision has a crucial influence of our future Whether young people in the past depend completely on their parents to make such important decision and today youngsters are more indepen 66
- The passage and lecture are both about a portraits of old woman which is may or may not doing by Rembrandt the writer claims that this portrait by was not done by Rembrandt the lecturer cast doubt on claim made in the article She believes that this portra 71
- The reading passage and lecturer both talk about economic benefits from offering four day work week for employee instead of five days The writer claim several benefits from this offering The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in article 60
- The passage and lecture about the the golden frog andv the severity of fungus that infects frog The author suggests three solutions to golden fungus problem The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article she says these solutions are not effective to 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecture are ...
^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this certification' or 'these certifications'?
Suggestion: this certification; these certifications
...hor claims three reasons to explain why these certification not important for wood companies in Uno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain certification to these factories. First of all, the writer states, america...
^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...tatement is challenged by professor. He mention, customers do not treat all advertismen...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wood, because company should pay to have examined by certification agency. The le...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity which is littl pit more expensive. Finally, the reading passage argues, eco...
^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'crowd'
Suggestion: crowd
...ot do that, other forgin companies will crowded in United State market.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, first of all, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48017621145 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00239575204 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621145374449 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4318913319 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.1111111111 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6111111111 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.543282968236 0.272083759551 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153332099869 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194055264873 0.0662205650399 293% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332534680908 0.162205337803 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.299299005722 0.0443174109184 675% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.