The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustration depicts the design of a wave-energy machine and the places it can be installed.
Overall, the first image gives us a cross-sectional view of the machine along with the movement of air, water, etc. However, the second diagram talks more about the installation costs and output versus the placement of machines.
The machine is divided into 2 main chambers, one which is partially immersed in water and the other where generation of electricity takes place. Air flows into the chamber through two places. One is from the water chamber where it flows upwards and the other is from outside of the top chamber where it flows downwards onto the turbines. When these turbines rotate, electricity is generated and the condensed water vapors flow back into the bottom chamber. Some air escapes the machine from the top chamber.
The placement of the machine has a huge impact on cost as well as output. Machines placed a little further from the shore have a high cost of installation and high output due to large waves. On the other hand, when placed near the shore, the cost is low along with the output due to the presence of small waves.
- It is commonly believed that nowadays main factors that affect a child s development are media pop culture and friends A different point of view is that family plays the most significant role Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- A Nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until the enter college 66
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 39
- The charts below show what percentage of their daily intake of various nutrients the average person in the USA consumes in each meal and in snacks These nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81909547739 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5206903722 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1355599745 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1818181818 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103706660992 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446126665809 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469024272619 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767748576862 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541953998872 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81909547739 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5206903722 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1355599745 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1818181818 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103706660992 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446126665809 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469024272619 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767748576862 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541953998872 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.