The chart shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given figure of bar diagram displays the value of one nations exports in many classification during 2015 to 2016. Likewise, the given table illustrates the proportion changed in each category of exports in 2016 contrast with 2015.
Overall, it is clearly shown that all earnings had sharp improvements except for gems and jewellery, which dropped slightly. The major share of earnings was for petroleum products, whereas textiles and engineered goods experienced the biggest bounce in percentage.
To begin with, the two major exports were petroleum products which went from around $61 billion in 2015 to around $63 billion after a year and engineered goods from approximately $58 billion to around $62 billion. That was a three percentage for petroleum and a far higher increment of 8.5% for engineered items.
The other three categories had much lower sales it compared to these two exports. However gems and jewellery was the only export item which declined by 5.18% from around $43 billion to approximately $41 billion. There was slight increase in agricultural products in 2016 compared with 2015. It was only 0.81% from $31billions to get just above $31 billions in 2015 and 2016 respectively. Textiles experienced the smallest amount of export in 2015 at around $26 billions but it was up dramatically by 15.24% to level itself with agricultural by 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 61
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun classification seems to be countable; consider using: 'many classifications'.
Suggestion: many classifications
...ays the value of one nations exports in many classification during 2015 to 2016. Likewise, the give...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...sales it compared to these two exports. However gems and jewellery was the only export ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, well, whereas, as for, except for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15837104072 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88023889456 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556561085973 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3015346282 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.636363636 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256962322548 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117916489972 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113087595354 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171195506855 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156976116037 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.