The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates data of the number of people who visited four different international museums from 1980 to 2015.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that, as time goes on the number of visitors to the Louvre and Vatican museums grew, while the opposite trend was seen in the case of the London Science Museum.
To begin with the upgoing trend, in 1980, 8 million people went to the Louvre museum to see the collections. On the other hand, almost 5 million visited the Vatican museums, after that, the number was increasing linearly and in 2015 the number rose to approximately nine million. In the case of the Louvre museum, from 1995 to 2000 the number climbed down from 9 to 8.5 million, then it began to rise and in 2015, ended at nine and a half million.
Turning to the others, for the London Science Museum, the number was remaining level off at 4 million from 1980 to 1985. After five years the number rapidly decreased to approximately 3.25 million. Then it gradually downgraded and in 2015 only 2.1 million people visited this museum. From the beginning till to 2000, it slipped down from 3.9 to 3.2, then it started to upgrade and finished at the same amount of beginning.
- University students must pay all tuition fees because it benefits mostly them individually rather than the society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 84
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 73
- There are more cars on the roads these days and more accidents are happening As a result some politicians have suggested that people should take regular driving tests throughout their lives rather than one single test What do you think are the advantages 73
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...vel off at 4 million from 1980 to 1985. After five years the number rapidly decreased...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shed at the same amount of beginning.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68224299065 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41590140816 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532710280374 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2626483513 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178755326499 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902757251226 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671800775338 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144656937048 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658365292043 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.