Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
We live in an age of information which is the means to succeed these days and there is no better way to learn it than sharing with the people of the world. However, the question always remains of what, how much and in what ways we should exchange this information. This essay focuses on the diverse attitudes towards information sharing and a reasoned conclusion with my personal opinion.
Initially, I think many people believe it is important to share information if we want to go forward in the fields of education, science, business and so on. Scientists must share their latest discoveries with other researchers around the world otherwise their own invention, discovery, research or survey will fail to achieve acceptability. Moreover, if ideas, plans or new learning are not shared by teachers and students with the rest of the world, the purpose of education also fails and distance learning over the internet can be included in this respect as the best example. As far as business goes, I personally know some successful business people who often say that they cannot think of a world without new entrepreneurs and expert businessmen confining themselves and not sharing their ideas.
Conversely, lots of people do not like the idea of sharing information and ideas for several reasons. One of them is the risk of losing a successful business which may threaten the future of a company or organization. One of my close friend's father lost his well-positioned business when he shared his success-secret with the media. Furthermore, sharing of information may also lead to chaotic political instability in some countries which may threaten the sovereignty of nations around the world. Additionally, if there is no regulation on information sharing, crimes like identity theft and blackmail will occur regularly. Hacking online servers and Facebook or Instagram accounts can be quoted in this context as valid examples.
In fine, I believe while there are cogent arguments for the free and fair flow of information in science and academic fields, there should be limits in what information we share publicly, especially, issues like personal pictures, videos, certain business ideas and sensitive national documents and so on. Therefore, I partly support both views.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 87
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...aring and a reasoned conclusion with my personal opinion. Initially, I think many people believ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as for, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20163487738 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92569214194 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58583106267 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4640755774 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.266666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316408089048 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948093371418 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585940640953 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182762916065 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372771760104 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.