The chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in a european country from 2005 to 2008
The bar chart tells us three different methods of waste disposal namely: landfill,burning and dumping in sea in a European country between 2005 and 2008.
In general, the amount in million tonnes of waste discarded in landfill and dumping in sea witnessed a stable downward pattern whereas burning had a wild fluctuation trend. Throughout the given period,in 2008, burning registered the highest amount out of three methods examined.
In 2005, landfill was the most using method, made up 70 million tonnes of waste. Thereafter, this figure steadily decreased by 10 million tonnes each year to 40 million tonnes in 2008. It can be seen that there was a similar movement in the amount of waste dumping in sea,which reached 55 million tonnes in 2005 and then slightly declined to 40 million tonnes at the end of the period.
With regard to the burning, in 2005, the amount of waste burnt was around 55 million tonnes. This figure experienced a dramatic change to reach a trough of 40 million tonnes in 2007 before going up again to 65 million tonnes in the following year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , burning
...thods of waste disposal namely: landfill,burning and dumping in sea in a European countr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... and 2008. In general, the amount in million tonnes of waste discarded in landfill a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ation trend. Throughout the given period,in 2008, burning registered the highest am...
^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...nt in the amount of waste dumping in sea,which reached 55 million tonnes in 2005 and t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, in general, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90710382514 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59017546284 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3451902338 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192375878034 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104294386237 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128535569051 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161411152917 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158186683602 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.